Why do you consider Glazers debts anyones business but theirs?
Man United are still the biggest selling sports brand in the world.
Shouldn’t you be having a pop at the greedy United fans who sold their United shares to them for profit?
Didn’t they put money before United?
Why do people feel they have the right to question the Glazers about what they do with their own business?
The indebtedness will only matter when it effects performance on the pitch.
Under the Glazers United have enjoyed more success than ever.
The Glazers doubled Fergy’s salary,they paid bonuses to all their staff at Man United of somewhere around 8 percent.
I can understand people being frustrated watching the Glazers raise the money to buy the club,and then making the club pay off the debt.
But there simply is no proof as yet that the Glazers are happy to settle for mediocrity in order to save cash.There has been no such compromise a far a I can see.
What is really getting to people is the fact that they see city spending big amounts,but when you consider City’s best player was Joey Barton,they had to spend to improve.
Any team that can amass 89 points in this league is not inferior to anyone,Arsenal were 3rd with 70 points.
I disagree success was achieved inspite of the Glazers,they made the money available for purchases,and have stated they will make funds available but will not pay top money for mediocre players.
Kompany is I think a great player,he didn’t cost a lot and as Hugh’s brought him to city you could argue Mancini is living off Hughes’s signings.
I do understand fans having a go at the Glazers,but I feel their anger is misguided as they have actually presided over one of Uniteds most successful periods ever.