Page 14 of 14

Re: Victor Lindelof

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 10:31 am
by dozer
No one is saying Lindelof is class.
But he's done well in the last 2 games against weak opposition. At least he's done enough to deserve chances. It's not like he's competing with Rio or Vidic.

Re: Victor Lindelof

Posted: Thu May 26, 2022 8:53 pm
by fat maradona
Have a read of this on Skysports - https://www.skysports.com/football/news ... s-explored

"Liverpool also pursued Virgil van Dijk, a transfer they finally completed in January. According to Charlie Austin, Van Dijk's Southampton team-mate, the Dutchman had been a target for United. He told Austin: "It was between me and Lindelof, and they signed Lindelof."

Staggering how inept the transfer decisions are.....

Re: Victor Lindelof

Posted: Fri May 27, 2022 10:38 am
by Jason
fat maradona wrote: 1 year ago Have a read of this on Skysports - https://www.skysports.com/football/news ... s-explored

"Liverpool also pursued Virgil van Dijk, a transfer they finally completed in January. According to Charlie Austin, Van Dijk's Southampton team-mate, the Dutchman had been a target for United. He told Austin: "It was between me and Lindelof, and they signed Lindelof."

Staggering how inept the transfer decisions are.....
4 years since last comment on this thread lol.
Sums up his utd career.

Was clear vvd was going to be a beast when he played at celtic, never mind Southampton.

You have to wonder wtf scouts are at.

Re: Victor Lindelof

Posted: Fri May 27, 2022 10:59 am
by Fuck the Glazers
fat maradona wrote: 1 year ago Have a read of this on Skysports - https://www.skysports.com/football/news ... s-explored

"Liverpool also pursued Virgil van Dijk, a transfer they finally completed in January. According to Charlie Austin, Van Dijk's Southampton team-mate, the Dutchman had been a target for United. He told Austin: "It was between me and Lindelof, and they signed Lindelof."

Staggering how inept the transfer decisions are.....
They should be up in the Hague for this one

Re: Victor Lindelof

Posted: Sat May 28, 2022 6:42 pm
by bman2
I’m sure they didn’t dig VVD because of the cost. Then after a season or two when the conventional wisdom was that VVD transformed Liverpool, the club decided it was ok to spend £80m on a CB. But of course they didn’t understand that not every CB was suddenly worth £80m, and they ended up with Maguire.