I can't be arsed to get into an endless back and forth debate, but there's a reason players like Hazard fell out with Mourinho and Chelsea sacked him in 2015. It wasn't because they were shit.
All I'll say is this: Mourinho has to take a large dollop of responsibility for Martial's form. Lukaku is not fit to tie the laces of the great players we've had in recent years. He might do OK at another club, but he just isn't good enough for United. Martial has the qualities. There's a difference.
Great! So Lukky goes through a really bad run of form after scoring 10 in 10 earlier in the season and is not good enough to play for United anymore. Yet Martial is the new Terry Henry without actually doing anything when he plays except sulk like a bell end when he gets subbed.
It must be a different Lukaku then that's breaking Belgiums scoring records while Martial goes into his 6th month of being dumped from the French squad. Probably Mourinho's fault that too.
But may be he's scoring them goals for Belgium because he has class service from De Bruyne and Hazard. Its a massive understatement to suggest considering what United paid for Martial, he's not on the same planet to either.
There is your "difference" kid.
"Hi guys...weekends here again. Hope youve all earned a few quid!!".