Sorry, it is people genuinely thinking that we have not been provided enough money to buy players when we have. That is not even an argument because every stat will show that we have spent more net than every other EPL club other than City if you consider the last 5 years.fat maradona wrote: ↑1 year agoSorry Danni, I've completely lost the point you are trying to make. Was it about money? Or was it that the owners aren't all that bad?
I think most fans are pissed off at our lack of purchases when the squad needs it the most. And so yes, it would be a solid gripe about money. Especially when the stadium is falling apart but the owners are paying themselves large dividends.
And then the other major gripe is that although we have spent money in the past, it was spunked on shite players that were marquee signings or quick, perceived fixes. And this, largely, due to a lack of structure at the very top and decisions made by a money man. And the money man is empowered by the Owners.
And so, regardless of what you say, all fingers point to the Owners.
This is not an argument. I am in fact going even further to say that you are daft and not doing your cause to get the owners out by saying they don’t give us enough money.
You cannot chant like a baby and say regardless of what I say because you are not listening. This is exactly what the moaning of fans who want the owners out based on baseless ludicrous claims is and has been a total failure.
So they should go out because we have a shit stadium? Are you having a laugh, can you imagine the banners.
GLAZERS OUT, I WANT A PLASTIC CUP HOLDER
You are making no sense my friend. The thing to investigate is why the Glazers are sticking with Woodwood.